Saying the prayers in Arabic vs reading the Qur'an in one's own language

Question:
When in the formal prayers, one must read the Qur'an in the original Arabic, regardless of whether one is understanding what one is uttering or not, but outside of the prayers not only is one free to read it in a language one understands, it is actually useless to do otherwise. Does that make any sense to you? Why is it not important to understand what one is saying when worshipping one's Lord and Creator, and why is it important to understand it when reciting it outside the prayer?

Response:
When one knows that al-Fatiha and some portion of Qur'an is necessary to be read in Salah, and Salah is meant to rememeber God, the person doing so is bound to look for its meanings. It would become a duty for him to do so. The Qur'an and the prophet, alaihissalaam, didn't mention that non-Arabs also have to understand the meanings of it because for one thing, all the immediate addressees of the Qur'an knew Arabic and for another, the implication was so obvious that there wasn't any need to explain it. If there were to be people who wouldn't get the opportunity to understand even the simple meanings of the Arabic text that they recite in Salah, it would be an excuse for them and would constitute an exception. And exceptions never prove the rule. The strange understanding that the Qur'an can be recited without intending to understand it, owes its origins to the explanation offered by some people who made a queer, indirect reference through a hadith to bring forth an understanding that completely negates the very purpose of reading the Qur'an. As a result of this understanding, a believer is now
reading the Qur'an with full satisfaction that he is reaping huge rewards without even botheirng to know what the Almighty is saying in the text. Can that be a correct understanding.

The hadith says that when a belivers recites Alif Laam Meem, he gets a reward of thirty units. The inference drawn was that since nobody knows the meanings of these letters, the idea being promoted is that one can read the Qur'an without understanding. This understanding is incorrect on two grounds: The letters Alif Laam Meem are the name of the surah and the full statement if unfolded is this: This surah is Alif Laam Meem. The other reason why this understanding is incorrect is that the Qur'an continues to
emphasise upon the reader that its text should be understood and reflected upon. If the meanings of a few letters in the book are not becoming apparent, it should be all the more reason to think even harder to understand their meanings. Indeed those who have gone through this excercise, have been able to bring out those meanings. Like in the case of Surah Nun, we now know that the surah begins with the letter which in Arabic means fish, and there is a mention of fish in the later part of the short surah thus:

"And don't be like the one who was (swallowed by) the fish."

Of course, this is not just a coincidence. Likewise, there is a huge scope for finding more clues in the rest of surahs beginning with these letters. So while one interpretation of the hadith is helping people to realize that the Qur'an can be read without bothering to know its meanings, the other is telling them that you need to think hard while reflecting upon the verses of the book so that you are able to get deeper meanings of it.

Views: 458